AMA backs House health reform bills while other groups seek changes to Senate bill
By Gina Brockenbrough 1st on the web (November 5, 2009)
As the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate ready their health care
reform bills, the American Medical Association (AMA) and several other major
medical associations are weighing in on prospective legislation.
In a press conference today, AMA President J. James Rohack, MD,
announced the organizations support of the Affordable Health Care for
America Act (H.R. 3962), and a companion bill that would repeal the physician
payment formula, the Medicare Physician Payment Reform Act of 2009 (H.R. 3961).
These are separate bills but they must be passed together,
Rohack said. Both are essential to achieving meaningful health system
reform this year.
advertisement
Rohack conceded that H.R. 3962 is not a perfect representation of the
AMAs views on health system reform, but said the measures in the bill
were consistent with a majority of the groups goals.
Widespread coverage
He said the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill
would provide coverage for nearly 96% of legal, non-elderly U.S. citizens. It
also includes market reform, improves coverage for preventive services,
establishes a health insurance exchange and addresses the shortage of primary
care physicians in rural and low-income areas.
J. James
Rohack
Rohack also noted that Medicare physicians face a 21% payment cut in
less than 60 days as well as additional cuts in the future that could limit
access to care for seniors and military families.
H.R. 3961 would stop these payment cuts and institute a realistic
way to pay physicians under Medicare that reflects the actual costs of medical
care, Rohack said in the press conference. This legislation is not
perfect, but this debate is not over and the work is not done. The AMA will
continue to work constructively with members of Congress and the White House to
improve legislation and to make sure that the voices of physicians and our
patients are heard as this legislation continues on through the process and
beyond.
Surgical coalition seeks changes to bill
Meanwhile, a coalition of 20 surgical organizations sent a letter to the
U.S. Senate yesterday warning that they will oppose the Senates health
care reform bill unless changes are made to the proposed legislation.
The group affirms that the current bill would limit patients
access to specialty care, may impede quality care and fails to address problems
that cripple the health care system.
The coalition, led by the American College of Surgeons, represents more
than 240,000 members of various medical groups, including the American
Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the sister organization of the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).
Other medical groups represented include the American Osteopathic
Academy of Orthopedics, the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the American
Society of Anesthesiologists.
The AAOS has called for meaningful health care reform for
decades, AAOS President Joseph D. Zuckerman, MD, said in a press release.
We, along with other surgical associations, are committed to working for
health care reform that makes surgical care more accessible to Americans. The
AAOS cannot lend its support to any legislation that does not expand
Americans access to quality care.
Payment formula scrutinized
According to the release, the groups said that they will oppose the bill
if certain measures of the Senate Committee Finance bill are included in the
final legislation.
The surgical groups noted that the bill fails to permanently fix the
Medicare Physician Payment Formula and lacks medical liability reforms. In
addition, the groups are against several expected provisions of the bill,
including mandatory participation in the Physician Quality Reporting
Initiative, reimbursement changes and shifting the authority of making Medicare
payment and coverage decisions to an unelected executive branch agency.
The AAOS has proposed several programs, such as the American Joint
Replacement Registry, that are aimed at improving quality, decreasing costs and
improving patient access to care. The group estimates that the national
registry project could save more than $1.3 billion over 20 years.
After examining specific aspects of the Senates health care
proposals, we believe that the bill will not address these concerns,
Zuckerman said in the press release. We remain ready, willing and able to
be a helpful participant in improving this legislation. Should the deficiencies
of the bill not be addressed, we, along with [others in] the surgical
community, must announce our opposition.