|
Study finds Dynesys dynamic stabilization ineffective against disc
degeneration
Investigators also found evidence contrary to the theoretical
advantages of Dynesys treatment.
By Robert Press ORTHOPAEDICS TODAY EUROPE 2009; 12:12
Dynesys dynamic stabilization does little to halt the progress of disc
degeneration in patients suffering from lower back pain, researchers have
found.
The findings are the result of a study by Alexandru Mertic, Medic, MSc,
and others at the Center for Spinal Research, Woodland Hospital in Aberdeen,
Scotland.
Mertic summarized the findings at the North American Spine Society 23rd
Annual Meeting in Toronto. advertisement

“Disc degeneration at the bridge segments remains the same despite
Dynesys dynamic stabilization, and it is difficult to determine if this
continued degeneration is due to the normal progression of the disease or to
the Dynesys stabilization,” he said.
|
 Alexandru Mertic
|
Mertic’s study aimed to evaluate disc changes at the segments
adjacent to and bridged by Dynesys dynamic stabilization system when used in
the management of chronic low back pain.
Study methods
Thirty-eight patients who were unresponsive to conservative measures
underwent Dynesys for chronic low back pain between November 2002 and June
2005, then completed a 2-year follow-up MRI scan. Of the 38 patients, 26
underwent Dynesys alone and 12 underwent additional fusion at one or more
levels. Surgeons operated on a total of 83 levels, 70 of which were bridged
only by Dynesys. Fusion was performed at 13 levels.
Two independent observers evaluated preoperative and 2-year
postoperative lumbar MRI scans. The researchers used T2-weighted mid-sagittal
images and classified disc degeneration according to the Woodend classification
of disc degeneration.
 |
 |
|
MRIs taken preoperatively (left) and 2
years postoperatively at L3-S1.
Images: Wardlaw D |
Both observers used their findings to calculate mean pre- and
postoperative scores for each patient at each of the five lumbar levels. Those
mean preoperative and postoperative scores were then compared using a paired
t-test procedure. Inter-observer agreement was measured using the weighted
Kappa scores.
Results and conclusions
According to the findings, there was a statistically significant
increase in the mean Woodend score for inter-segmental levels bridges only by
Dynesys – from 2.20 preoperatively to 2.51 at 2 years postoperatively
(P < .001).
For adjacent segments, mean Woodend scores changed from 1.35
preoperatively to 1.51 postoperatively if only the proximal segments were
included, Mertic said. When both proximal and distal adjacent segments were
included, the mean scores changed from 1.36 to 1.53.
The investigators noted progressive degeneration in eight of 46 adjacent
levels, and there was satisfactory interobserver agreement – a weighted
Kappa score of 0.819.
The results of the study pointed toward Dynesys dynamic stabilization
being ineffective against disc degeneration. Douglas Wardlaw, MB, MhB, ChM, FRCSEd, lead author of the
paper, said, “We have previously demonstrated that Dynesys does not
increase the range of movement at the cephald adjacent segment (Beastall et
al), which is considered to increase the likelihood of degenerative change
following fusion. Therefore, the long-term effect of these findings is
unknown at present. Longer follow-up is needed."
For more information:
References:
Beastall J, Siddiqui M. Karadimas E. Nicol M. Hughes J, Smith FW.
Wardlaw D. The Dynesys Lumbar Spinal Stabilization System. A Preliminary Report
On Positional Magnetic Imaging Findings. Spine. 32(6):685-90, 2007
Mar 15.
Mertic A. Radiographic disc changes in the bridged and adjacent
segments following Dynesys dynamic stabilization. Presented at the North
American Spine Society 23rd Annual Meeting. Oct. 14-18, 2008. Toronto.
|