Orthopedics SuperSite Orthopedics Today Free Renewal
Advanced Search Login to ORTHO SuperSite
Go to Start Page
European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ORTHOPAEDICS TODAY EUROPE is the official newspaper of EFORT Breaking Influenza A (H1N1) Updates Arthritis Arthroscopy Biologics Business of Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Hand/Upper Extremity Hip Imaging Infection Knee Oncology Osteoporosis Pediatrics Rehabilitation Shoulder/Elbow Spine Sports Medicine Trauma Surgical Techniques Round Tables Commentary 4 Questions with Dr. Jackson Find a Meeting Orthopedics Today Hawaii 2011 RSS Mobile Submit a manuscript Subscriber Services Order article reprints Classified Marketplace Bookstore SIGN UP FOR THE ORTHO SuperSite NewsWire
 
Spine
Print This Page  Send This Page To A Friend 
 
 

Study finds Dynesys dynamic stabilization ineffective against disc degeneration

Investigators also found evidence contrary to the theoretical advantages of Dynesys treatment.

By Robert Press
ORTHOPAEDICS TODAY EUROPE 2009; 12:12

Dynesys dynamic stabilization does little to halt the progress of disc degeneration in patients suffering from lower back pain, researchers have found.

OTE at NASS

The findings are the result of a study by Alexandru Mertic, Medic, MSc, and others at the Center for Spinal Research, Woodland Hospital in Aberdeen, Scotland.

Mertic summarized the findings at the North American Spine Society 23rd Annual Meeting in Toronto.


advertisement
COBI

“Disc degeneration at the bridge segments remains the same despite Dynesys dynamic stabilization, and it is difficult to determine if this continued degeneration is due to the normal progression of the disease or to the Dynesys stabilization,” he said.

Alexandru Mertic, Medic, MSc
Alexandru Mertic

Mertic’s study aimed to evaluate disc changes at the segments adjacent to and bridged by Dynesys dynamic stabilization system when used in the management of chronic low back pain.

Study methods

Thirty-eight patients who were unresponsive to conservative measures underwent Dynesys for chronic low back pain between November 2002 and June 2005, then completed a 2-year follow-up MRI scan. Of the 38 patients, 26 underwent Dynesys alone and 12 underwent additional fusion at one or more levels. Surgeons operated on a total of 83 levels, 70 of which were bridged only by Dynesys. Fusion was performed at 13 levels.

Two independent observers evaluated preoperative and 2-year postoperative lumbar MRI scans. The researchers used T2-weighted mid-sagittal images and classified disc degeneration according to the Woodend classification of disc degeneration.

Preoperative Postoperative 2 years

MRIs taken preoperatively (left) and 2 years postoperatively at L3-S1.

Images: Wardlaw D

Both observers used their findings to calculate mean pre- and postoperative scores for each patient at each of the five lumbar levels. Those mean preoperative and postoperative scores were then compared using a paired t-test procedure. Inter-observer agreement was measured using the weighted Kappa scores.

Results and conclusions

According to the findings, there was a statistically significant increase in the mean Woodend score for inter-segmental levels bridges only by Dynesys – from 2.20 preoperatively to 2.51 at 2 years postoperatively (P < .001).

For adjacent segments, mean Woodend scores changed from 1.35 preoperatively to 1.51 postoperatively if only the proximal segments were included, Mertic said. When both proximal and distal adjacent segments were included, the mean scores changed from 1.36 to 1.53.

The investigators noted progressive degeneration in eight of 46 adjacent levels, and there was satisfactory interobserver agreement – a weighted Kappa score of 0.819.

The results of the study pointed toward Dynesys dynamic stabilization being ineffective against disc degeneration. Douglas Wardlaw, MB, MhB, ChM, FRCSEd, lead author of the paper, said, “We have previously demonstrated that Dynesys does not increase the range of movement at the cephald adjacent segment (Beastall et al), which is considered to increase the likelihood of degenerative change following fusion. Therefore, the long-term effect of these findings is unknown at present. Longer follow-up is needed."

For more information: References:

Beastall J, Siddiqui M. Karadimas E. Nicol M. Hughes J, Smith FW. Wardlaw D. The Dynesys Lumbar Spinal Stabilization System. A Preliminary Report On Positional Magnetic Imaging Findings. Spine. 32(6):685-90, 2007 Mar 15.

Mertic A. Radiographic disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments following Dynesys dynamic stabilization. Presented at the North American Spine Society 23rd Annual Meeting. Oct. 14-18, 2008. Toronto.


NASS 2008 Meeting Highlights

· Study: MIS lateral spine fusion safe and effective for morbidly obese patients
· Spine fusion yields significant improvements in quality of life
· Anterior cervical discectomy, fusion have good outcomes for stenosis, herniation

Send This Page To A Friend



Visit us regularly for daily orthopedic news.

About SLACK Inc. |  Contact Us |  Careers |  FAQ

Copyright ® 2010 SLACK Incorporated. All rights reserved.

38.107.191.117 Web Statistics